Brain Wealthy
    What's Hot

    Bridging the Gender Gap: Inspiring Words from the Women Making Waves on Starship | Annie Handrick | | Starship Technologies | March 2023

    March 8, 2023

    AI apps like ChatGPT may finally kill the cover letter

    March 8, 2023

    Snow Crash author Neal Stephenson on the metaverse, making movies, climate fears

    March 6, 2023
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Brain Wealthy
    • Home
    • Anxiety

      FSU psychologist receives $3.7 million grant to combat anxiety in seniors with Alzheimer’s and cognitive impairment

      February 2, 2023

      How anxiety came to dominate the big business of medical marijuana cards in Pa.

      February 2, 2023

      How to Reduce Anxiety in Stressful Situations

      February 2, 2023

      The cat in boots The last wish taught me about anxiety

      February 2, 2023

      Inseparable cat trio with ‘separation anxiety brothers’ find new home

      February 2, 2023
    • Emotion

      Leigh-Anne Pinnock shares emotional post about embarking on her solo career

      February 2, 2023

      Ontario paramedic emotional during last radio call

      February 2, 2023

      A Pianist Faces Death and Recorded Music of Unspeakable Emotions

      February 2, 2023

      Return of home post linking Gichaara to ancestors is emotional for north coast nation

      February 2, 2023

      Mother of two sues New York school district for ‘mental distress’ caused by mask enforcement

      February 2, 2023
    • Neurology

      Gardasil Injection Lawsuit Claims HPV Vaccine Caused Neurological and Autonomic Dysfunction

      February 2, 2023

      REGENXBIO’s Duchenne Therapy RGX-202 Clinical Trial Begins Patient Recruitment

      February 2, 2023

      Aducanumab for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease

      February 2, 2023

      Potential for Effective Comparative Studies and Treatment Approval in Epilepsy Care: Anup Patel, MD

      February 2, 2023

      Head injury does not predict memory impairment in NFL retirees, UT Southwestern study shows: Newsroom

      February 2, 2023
    • Sleep

      Review: Never Sleep Again: The Elm Street Legacy – Blu-ray

      February 2, 2023

      Get a better night’s sleep with better pillows from The Pillow Bar in Dallas

      February 2, 2023

      Is it okay to sleep with a necklace on?

      February 2, 2023

      Does tart cherry juice improve sleep?

      February 2, 2023

      Social Jet Lag, Sleep Chronotypes, and Why We Gotta Close Our Eyes and Embrace It

      February 2, 2023
    • Brain Research

      spark!Talk – video available online

      February 2, 2023

      Studies have found that obesity-related neurodegeneration mimics Alzheimer’s disease.newsroom

      February 2, 2023

      The Brain Observatory: New Museum to Participate in Museum Month

      February 1, 2023

      who wants to live forever

      February 1, 2023

      UK company makes surprise forays

      February 1, 2023
    • Brain Wealth
      1. Mental Health
      2. View All

      Research project applies a global lens to student mental health

      February 2, 2023

      DC Metro shooting suspect undergoes mental health evaluation after rampage

      February 2, 2023

      Gov. Ho-Chol unveils details of $1 billion plan to overhaul New York State’s mental health care continuum

      February 2, 2023

      Boston, we have a problem: data on mental health and practice come in

      February 2, 2023

      Research project applies a global lens to student mental health

      February 2, 2023

      DC Metro shooting suspect undergoes mental health evaluation after rampage

      February 2, 2023

      Gov. Ho-Chol unveils details of $1 billion plan to overhaul New York State’s mental health care continuum

      February 2, 2023

      Boston, we have a problem: data on mental health and practice come in

      February 2, 2023
    Brain Wealthy
    Home»Neurology»Neurological and psychiatric risk trajectories after SARS-CoV-2 infection: an analysis of 2-year retrospective cohort studies including 1 284 437 patients
    Neurology

    Neurological and psychiatric risk trajectories after SARS-CoV-2 infection: an analysis of 2-year retrospective cohort studies including 1 284 437 patients

    brainwealthy_vws1exBy brainwealthy_vws1exAugust 17, 2022No Comments30 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Telegram Pinterest Tumblr Reddit WhatsApp Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Summary

    Background

    COVID-19 is associated with increased risks of neurological and psychiatric sequelae in the weeks and months thereafter. How long these risks remain, whether they affect children and adults similarly, and whether SARS-CoV-2 variants differ in their risk profiles remains unclear.

    Methods

    In this analysis of 2-year retrospective cohort studies, we extracted data from the TriNetX electronic health records network, an international network of de-identified data from health-care records of approximately 89 million patients collected from hospital, primary care, and specialist providers (mostly from the USA, but also from Australia, the UK, Spain, Bulgaria, India, Malaysia, and Taiwan). A cohort of patients of any age with COVID-19 diagnosed between Jan 20, 2020, and April 13, 2022, was identified and propensity-score matched (1:1) to a contemporaneous cohort of patients with any other respiratory infection. Matching was done on the basis of demographic factors, risk factors for COVID-19 and severe COVID-19 illness, and vaccination status. Analyses were stratified by age group (age <18 years [children], 18–64 years [adults], and ≥65 years [older adults]) and date of diagnosis. We assessed the risks of 14 neurological and psychiatric diagnoses after SARS-CoV-2 infection and compared these risks with the matched comparator cohort. The 2-year risk trajectories were represented by time-varying hazard ratios (HRs) and summarised using the 6-month constant HRs (representing the risks in the earlier phase of follow-up, which have not yet been well characterised in children), the risk horizon for each outcome (ie, the time at which the HR returns to 1), and the time to equal incidence in the two cohorts. We also estimated how many people died after a neurological or psychiatric diagnosis during follow-up in each age group. Finally, we compared matched cohorts of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 directly before and after the emergence of the alpha (B.1.1.7), delta (B.1.617.2), and omicron (B.1.1.529) variants.

    Findings

    We identified 1 487 712 patients with a recorded diagnosis of COVID-19 during the study period, of whom 1 284 437 (185 748 children, 856 588 adults, and 242 101 older adults; overall mean age 42·5 years [SD 21·9]; 741 806 [57·8%] were female and 542 192 [42·2%] were male) were adequately matched with an equal number of patients with another respiratory infection. The risk trajectories of outcomes after SARS-CoV-2 infection in the whole cohort differed substantially. While most outcomes had HRs significantly greater than 1 after 6 months (with the exception of encephalitis; Guillain-Barré syndrome; nerve, nerve root, and plexus disorder; and parkinsonism), their risk horizons and time to equal incidence varied greatly. Risks of the common psychiatric disorders returned to baseline after 1–2 months (mood disorders at 43 days, anxiety disorders at 58 days) and subsequently reached an equal overall incidence to the matched comparison group (mood disorders at 457 days, anxiety disorders at 417 days). By contrast, risks of cognitive deficit (known as brain fog), dementia, psychotic disorders, and epilepsy or seizures were still increased at the end of the 2-year follow-up period. Post-COVID-19 risk trajectories differed in children compared with adults: in the 6 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection, children were not at an increased risk of mood (HR 1·02 [95% CI 0·94–1·10) or anxiety (1·00 [0·94–1·06]) disorders, but did have an increased risk of cognitive deficit, insomnia, intracranial haemorrhage, ischaemic stroke, nerve, nerve root, and plexus disorders, psychotic disorders, and epilepsy or seizures (HRs ranging from 1·20 [1·09–1·33] to 2·16 [1·46–3·19]). Unlike adults, cognitive deficit in children had a finite risk horizon (75 days) and a finite time to equal incidence (491 days). A sizeable proportion of older adults who received a neurological or psychiatric diagnosis, in either cohort, subsequently died, especially those diagnosed with dementia or epilepsy or seizures. Risk profiles were similar just before versus just after the emergence of the alpha variant (n=47 675 in each cohort). Just after (vs just before) the emergence of the delta variant (n=44 835 in each cohort), increased risks of ischaemic stroke, epilepsy or seizures, cognitive deficit, insomnia, and anxiety disorders were observed, compounded by an increased death rate. With omicron (n=39 845 in each cohort), there was a lower death rate than just before emergence of the variant, but the risks of neurological and psychiatric outcomes remained similar.

    Interpretation

    This analysis of 2-year retrospective cohort studies of individuals diagnosed with COVID-19 showed that the increased incidence of mood and anxiety disorders was transient, with no overall excess of these diagnoses compared with other respiratory infections. In contrast, the increased risk of psychotic disorder, cognitive deficit, dementia, and epilepsy or seizures persisted throughout. The differing trajectories suggest a different pathogenesis for these outcomes. Children have a more benign overall profile of psychiatric risk than do adults and older adults, but their sustained higher risk of some diagnoses is of concern. The fact that neurological and psychiatric outcomes were similar during the delta and omicron waves indicates that the burden on the health-care system might continue even with variants that are less severe in other respects. Our findings are relevant to understanding individual-level and population-level risks of neurological and psychiatric disorders after SARS-CoV-2 infection and can help inform our responses to them.

    Funding

    National Institute for Health and Care Research Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre, The Wolfson Foundation, and MQ Mental Health Research.

    Introduction

    Since the early stages of the pandemic, COVID-19 has been known to be associated with an increased risk of many neurological and psychiatric sequelae.

    1

    • Rogers JP
    • Chesney E
    • Oliver D
    • et al.
    Psychiatric and neuropsychiatric presentations associated with severe coronavirus infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis with comparison to the COVID-19 pandemic.

    , 

    2

    • Taquet M
    • Luciano S
    • Geddes JR
    • Harrison PJ
    Bidirectional associations between COVID-19 and psychiatric disorder: retrospective cohort studies of 62 354 COVID-19 cases in the USA.

    , 

    3

    High-dimensional characterization of post-acute sequelae of COVID-19.

    , 

    4

    • Taquet M
    • Geddes JR
    • Husain M
    • Luciano S
    • Harrison PJ
    6-month neurological and psychiatric outcomes in 236 379 survivors of COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records.

    , 

    5

    • Daugherty SE
    • Guo Y
    • Heath K
    • et al.
    Risk of clinical sequelae after the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection: retrospective cohort study.

    However, more than 2 years after the first case was diagnosed, three important questions remain unanswered.

    First, we do not know if or when the risks of different post-COVID-19 outcomes return to baseline. This information is important to patients (who want to know when they can stop worrying about potential complications of their SARS-CoV-2 infection), clinicians (who need to know whether a clinical presentation is plausibly attributable to a post-COVID condition), and health policy makers (who must plan appropriate service provision). Previous studies on the neurological and psychiatric sequelae of COVID-19 did not investigate this question.

    3

    High-dimensional characterization of post-acute sequelae of COVID-19.

    , 

    4

    • Taquet M
    • Geddes JR
    • Husain M
    • Luciano S
    • Harrison PJ
    6-month neurological and psychiatric outcomes in 236 379 survivors of COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records.

    , 

    5

    • Daugherty SE
    • Guo Y
    • Heath K
    • et al.
    Risk of clinical sequelae after the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection: retrospective cohort study.

    , 

    6

    Risks of mental health outcomes in people with COVID-19: cohort study.

    One study estimated the prevalence of self-reported anxiety, depressive, and sleep symptoms at 2, 2–6, and 6–16 months after COVID-19 diagnosis and found that the prevalence of depressive symptoms, but not sleep symptoms, decreased over time.

    7

    • Magnúsdóttir I
    • Lovik A
    • Unnarsdóttir AB
    • et al.
    Acute COVID-19 severity and mental health morbidity trajectories in patient populations of six nations: an observational study.

    Although informative, the self-reported nature of these findings and the restricted range of outcomes measured limit their usefulness for clinical practice and for informing public health policies.

    Research in contextEvidence before this studyWe searched PubMed (Medline) on March 21, 2022, for publications since database inception in English using the terms “(neuropsychiatr*[Title/Abstract] OR neurologic*[Title/Abstract] OR psychiatric[Title/Abstract] OR depress*[Title/Abstract] OR anxiety*[Title/Abstract] OR cognit*[Title/Abstract] OR brain[Title/Abstract]) AND (variant*[Title/Abstract] OR omicron[Title/Abstract] OR delta[Title/Abstract] OR evolution[Title/Abstract]) AND (COVID[Title/Abstract] OR COVID-19[Title/Abstract] OR SARS*[Title/Abstract])”. We found cohort studies and systematic reviews reporting neuropsychiatric sequelae persisting up to 10 months after COVID-19. We found one large, 6-month electronic health records study of neuropsychiatric disorders after a COVID-19 diagnosis. This study reported increased incidence and relative risk of cognitive symptoms and anxiety or depression 6 months after COVID-19, compared with influenza. We are not aware of any large-scale data regarding long-term COVID-19 sequelae beyond 12 months, or the evolution of incidence or relative risk of neuropsychiatric diagnoses in patients recovered from COVID-19 throughout the pandemic, stratified by COVID-19 variant or vaccination status.Added value of this studyTo our knowledge, this is the first study with a comparator cohort that assesses the risks of a range of neurological and psychiatric outcomes of COVID-19 up to 2 years after the index SARS-CoV-2 infection. We found that the risks of post-COVID neurological and psychiatric outcomes follow different trajectories: the risk of cognitive deficit, dementia, psychotic disorder, and epilepsy or seizures remain elevated 2 years after SARS-CoV-2 infection, while the risks of other diagnoses (notably, mood and anxiety disorders) subside after 1–2 months and show no overall excess over the whole 2-year follow-up. We also found that risk trajectories differ somewhat in children: they are not at an increased risk of mood or anxiety disorders (even over the first 6 months) and their risk of cognitive deficit is transient, but they share adults’ risk of several other diagnoses and are notably at risk of epilepsy or seizures. Finally, we found that the risks of neurological and psychiatric outcomes remain similar after the emergence of the omicron (B.1.1.529) variant as with the delta (B.1.617.2) variant, but are offset by a significantly lower death rate.Implications of all the available evidenceThe persisting increased risk of post-COVID-19 cognitive deficit, dementia, psychotic disorders, and epilepsy or seizures 2 years after the index infection calls for enhanced service provision to diagnose and manage these sequelae, and research to understand the mechanisms. The differing profile of post-COVID-19 neurological and psychiatric diagnoses in children informs the risk–benefit association of policies aimed at preventing COVID-19 in paediatric populations and suggests that underlying mechanisms might in part be different from those in adults. The observation of comparable neurological and psychiatric risks just after (compared with just before) emergence of the omicron variant suggests an ongoing neuropsychiatric burden of COVID-19 even with variants that lead to otherwise less severe disease.

    Second, the risk profile in different age strata, especially in children, has not been well characterised.

    8

    • Hirt J
    • Janiaud P
    • Gloy V
    • et al.
    Validity of reported post-acute health outcomes in children with SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review.

    Neurological manifestations of COVID-19 in paediatric populations (aged

    9

    • Ray STJ
    • Abdel-Mannan O
    • Sa M
    • et al.
    Neurological manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infection in hospitalised children and adolescents in the UK: a prospective national cohort study.

    but only one controlled study has investigated the risk of neurological and psychiatric outcomes after SARS-CoV-2 infection.

    10

    • Roessler M
    • Tesch F
    • Batram M
    • et al.
    Post COVID-19 in children, adolescents, and adults: results of a matched cohort study including more than 150,000 individuals with COVID-19.

    This study was limited to a 3-month follow-up period and measured neurological and psychiatric outcomes as two broad categories, without reporting the risk of individual diagnoses.

    Third, whether or not risk profiles have changed with the emergence of different variants is unknown; in particular, whether or not the omicron (B.1.1.529) variant, which has a lower mortality rate and better acute outcomes than the alpha (B.1.1.7) and delta (B.1.617.2) variants

    11

    • Wang L
    • Berger NA
    • Kaelber DC
    • Davis PB
    • Volkow ND
    • Xu R
    COVID infection rates, clinical outcomes, and racial/ethnic and gender disparities before and after omicron emerged in the US.

    , 

    12

    • Maslo C
    • Friedland R
    • Toubkin M
    • Laubscher A
    • Akaloo T
    • Kama B
    Characteristics and outcomes of hospitalized patients in South Africa during the COVID-19 omicron wave compared with previous waves.

    , 

    13

    • Nyberg T
    • Ferguson NM
    • Nash SG
    • et al.
    Comparative analysis of the risks of hospitalisation and death associated with SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529) and delta (B.1.617.2) variants in England: a cohort study.

    and a different symptom profile,

    14

    • Menni C
    • Valdes AM
    • Polidori L
    • et al.
    Symptom prevalence, duration, and risk of hospital admission in individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 during periods of omicron and delta variant dominance: a prospective observational study from the ZOE COVID Study.

    also leads to fewer neurological and psychiatric sequelae.

    We used electronic health records to investigate these three questions. We assessed the 2-year risk trajectories of 14 neurological and psychiatric diagnoses in three age groups (children younger than 18 years, adults aged 18–64 years, and older adults aged ≥65 years), and if and when these risks returned to baseline. Then we compared these risks between patients diagnosed just after versus just before the emergence of the alpha, delta, and omicron variants.

    Results

    We extracted data for 1 487 712 patients with a recorded diagnosis of COVID-19 between Jan 20, 2020, and April 13, 2022, from the TriNetX Analytics database, of whom 1 284 437 were adequately matched (ie, standardised mean difference of table 1; appendix pp 15–26). In the matched COVD-19 cohort, 741 806 (57·8%) patients were female and 542 192 (42·2%) were male; in the matched comparator cohort with another respiratory infection, 741 696 (57·7%) were female and 542 305 (42·2%) were male.

    Table 1Baseline characteristics for the whole COVID-19 cohort and the matched cohorts of COVID-19 patients and patients diagnosed with another respiratory infection

    Data are mean (SD) and n (%). For clarity purposes, apart from race, only characteristics with a prevalence over 5% in the unmatched COVID-19 cohort are shown here; the same table with all characteristics included is presented in the appendix (pp 15–17).
    The 2-year risk trajectories for each outcome, and for any first outcome, are shown in figure 1 and summarised in table 2 in terms of three key statistics: HR at 6-months, risk horizon, and time to equal incidence. In terms of 6-months HRs, compared with patients with other respiratory infections, patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were at increased risk of having any first neurological or psychiatric diagnosis, and of being diagnosed with an anxiety disorder, mood disorder, psychotic disorder, insomnia, cognitive deficit, dementia, epilepsy or seizures, ischaemic stroke, intracranial haemorrhage, and myoneural junction or muscle disease, but not encephalitis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, or parkinsonism (table 2). They were at a significantly lower risk of nerve, nerve root, and plexus disorder (table 2). All 6-month HRs, p values (including Bonferroni-corrected p values), death rates, markers of severity of the index infections, and results including death as a composite outcome are shown in the appendix (pp 27–28).

    Figure thumbnail gr1

    Figure 1Kaplan-Meier curves and time-varying HRs over the 2-year follow-up period for each outcome (A-N) and any first outcome (O) after COVID-19 or another respiratory infection in the propensity-score matched cohorts

    Show full caption

    Risk horizons are shown for panels A and B and time to equal incidence is shown on panel A; risk horizons and time to equal incidence for all other outcomes are shown in table 2. Shaded areas around curves show 95% CIs.

    Table 2Risk of neurological and psychiatric sequelae at 6 months, risk horizon, and time to equal incidence for each diagnosis after COVID-19 versus after other respiratory infections, in the propensity-score matched population

    The risk horizon is the time at which the time-varying hazard ratio returns to 1 (ie, the baseline risk in the comparison cohort). The time to equal incidence is the time at which the cumulative incidences of the two cohorts become equal. The risk horizon and time to equal incidence are only included for outcomes with a significantly increased hazard ratio at 6 months; for outcomes that did not reach the risk horizon or time to equal incidence within the follow-up period (up to 730 days), they are shown as not reached (NR).

    The results for children, adults and older adults are presented in the appendix (pp 12–14, 39–31). In terms of HRs at 6 months, four main differences from the whole cohort were observed (figure 2). First, in children, unlike older groups, there was no increased risk of mood or anxiety disorder. Second, children, unlike other age groups, were at an increased risk of encephalitis after COVID-19 compared with other respiratory infection. Third, unlike adults and older adults who were at a reduced risk of nerve, nerve root, and plexus disorder compared with the matched cohort of patients with another respiratory infection, children were at an increased risk of this outcome after COVID-19. Fourth, the risk of any first diagnosis was higher in older adults than in younger age groups, reflecting their higher HRs for most individual diagnoses.

    Figure thumbnail gr2

    Figure 2Hazard ratios for the 6-month risk of neurological and psychiatric sequelae after COVID-19 versus another respiratory infection, in different age groups, in the propensity-score matched population

    Show full caption

    Data are hazard ratios with 95% CIs. Children defined as younger than 18 years, adult, aged 18–64 years, and older adults as aged 65 years or older

    Besides the 6-months HRs, 2-year risk trajectories can be summarised by their risk horizon and time to equal incidence. In terms of these two statistics, outcomes fell into three categories (figure 1, table 2; see appendix pp 12–14, 29–31 for a breakdown by age groups). In a first category (figure 1A), within 2 years, HRs have returned to baseline (eg, mood disorder at 43 days, anxiety disorder at 58 days, and ischaemic stroke at 66 days) and an equal cumulative incidence between cohorts was subsequently reached (eg, mood disorder at 457 days, anxiety disorder at 417 days, ischaemic stroke at 712 days). Therefore, these outcomes showed a transient risk trajectory, because no increase in cumulative incidence was observed at 2 years despite an increased risk at 6 months. In a second category (figure 1B), a risk horizon was reached within 2 years but equal incidence was not reached. These outcomes showed a persistent risk trajectory: an increased cumulative incidence persists after 2 years in the COVID-19 cohort, but there is no increased risk of new diagnoses past the risk horizon. In a third category (figure 1C), which includes cognitive deficit, dementia, psychotic disorders, and epilepsy or seizures, HRs remained greater than 1 at the end of the follow-up period. These outcomes followed an ongoing risk trajectory, wherein new diagnoses were still being made more frequently after COVID-19 diagnosis than after a diagnosis of another respiratory infection up to 2 years after the index event. These different risk trajectories were broadly similar in children, adults, and older adults (appendix pp 12–14, 29–31), with three exceptions. In children, cognitive deficit followed a transient risk trajectory, with a finite risk horizon (75 days) and a finite time to equal incidence (491 days). Conversely, intracranial haemorrhage and nerve, nerve root, and plexus disorder had an ongoing risk trajectory in children, such that they did not reach a risk horizon (nor therefore a time to equal incidence) within 2 years.
    The endpoints of the 2-year risk trajectories can be summarised in terms of cumulative incidence at the end of the 2-year follow-up period and the proportion of patients with each diagnosis who subsequently died during the follow-up (figure 3; appendix pp 32–33). Interpretation of these findings, and the absence of differences between the matched cohorts with COVID-19 and other respiratory infection, should take into account the broadening 95% CI towards later stages of follow-up (as shown in the Kaplan-Meier curves in figure 1), due to the decreasing number of people contributing data. We found no evidence of a greater overall risk of any first neurological or psychiatric diagnosis after COVID-19 than after any other respiratory infection. This finding reflects the large contribution of mood and anxiety disorders to any first diagnosis, and their time to equal incidence. In older adults, death was common in those who received a neurological or psychiatric diagnosis regardless of whether they had COVID-19 or another respiratory infection, exceeding 50% for several of the neurological disorders and for psychotic disorder. The significantly higher 2-year cumulative incidences observed after COVID-19 (vs another respiratory infection) for outcomes with persistent or ongoing risk trajectories were reflected differently across age groups: the difference in incidence of cognitive deficit and dementia between cohorts was more noticeable for older adults than for adults or children; that of myoneural junction or muscle diseases was predominantly seen in children and adults but not older adults; that of epilepsy or seizures was significant only in children, and the risk of psychotic disorder was more evident for children and older adults than for adults.

    Figure thumbnail gr3

    Figure 3Cumulative incidence of neurological and psychiatric diagnoses at 2 years after COVID-19 versus another respiratory infection, in different age groups, by mortality status at 2 years (or censorship date), in the matched cohorts

    Show full caption

    The proportion next to each bar corresponds to the overall incidence of the outcome within that age group and the number in brackets indicates the proportion of those with the outcome who died within 2 years. Estimated numbers of deaths that are lower than 120 are unreliable and therefore not reported. 95% CIs for each estimate, and p values for each outcome, are in the appendix (p 32). NR=not reported *p
    For our analysis of risk of outcomes with new variants, we compiled six additional US COVID-19 cohorts: the primary alpha (n=47 675), delta (n=44 835), and omicron (n=39 845) cohorts, and matched control cohorts of equal size diagnosed just before the emergence of alpha, delta, and omicron, respectively (baseline characteristics for each cohort are shown in the appendix [pp 34–42]). We found the risk profiles for each outcome evolved as new variants emerged (figure 4; appendix pp 43–46). We observed little change in terms of 6-month HRs between the patients diagnosed just before and just after the emergence of the alpha variant. By contrast, significantly higher 6-month risks of anxiety disorders, insomnia, cognitive deficit, epilepsy or seizures, and ischaemic strokes, but a lower risk of dementia, were observed in those diagnosed just after the emergence of the delta variant than in those diagnosed just before. These risks were compounded by a higher risk of death just after the emergence of the delta variant, such that the risk of composite outcomes of individual sequelae or death was all significantly higher for those diagnosed just after emergence of the delta variant (including the composite of dementia or death). Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 just after (vs just before) the emergence of the omicron variant were at an increased risk (over 140 days of follow-up) of dementia, mood disorders, and nerve, nerve root, and plexus disorders, and at a broadly similar risk of most other outcomes. However, risks were more than offset by a substantially lower risk of death, such that the composite risks of each outcome and death were significantly lower than among those diagnosed just before the emergence of omicron.

    Figure thumbnail gr4

    Figure 4Risk of neurological and psychiatric outcomes after versus before the emergence of different SARS-CoV-2 variants, in the USA

    Show full caption

    (A) Daily incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection per million people in the USA (rolling 7-day average), by dominance of different variant. Areas surrounded by solid black lines indicate the time during which the cohort for a particular variant had their COVID-19 diagnosis. Areas surrounded by dotted black lines indicate the time during which the preceding variant cohort had their COVID-19 diagnosis. (B) Hazard ratios for the 6-month risk (140-days risk for omicron) of neurological and psychiatric sequelae, either analysed in isolation or as composite outcomes with death (ie, outcome or death). Hazard ratios with their 95% CIs and p values for each outcome, are in the appendix (pp 43–46) *p

    Discussion

    In this analysis of retrospective cohort studies, in addition to supporting previous findings of an increased risk of a range of neurological and psychiatric diagnoses in the first 6 months after COVID-19 diagnosis,

    3

    High-dimensional characterization of post-acute sequelae of COVID-19.

    , 

    4

    • Taquet M
    • Geddes JR
    • Husain M
    • Luciano S
    • Harrison PJ
    6-month neurological and psychiatric outcomes in 236 379 survivors of COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records.

    , 

    5

    • Daugherty SE
    • Guo Y
    • Heath K
    • et al.
    Risk of clinical sequelae after the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection: retrospective cohort study.

    we found substantial differences in the trajectories of these risks within the first 2 years after diagnosis. We also found that risk profiles and trajectories vary in children compared with adults and older adults, and differ between variants of SARS-CoV-2.

    We summarised risk trajectories using risk horizons and times to equal incidences and our findings are of interest to both patients and clinicians. For instance, from the risk horizons, if no anxiety disorder has been diagnosed within 2 months of a COVID-19 diagnosis then, from that time onwards, a patient can be reassured that their risk is no longer any greater than after another respiratory infection. If a patient had developed an ischaemic stroke within 2 months of a COVID-19 diagnosis, it is plausible that the COVID-19 diagnosis contributed (whether directly or indirectly) to its occurrence, but beyond 2 months, other causes should be actively considered. Risk trajectories are also informative for public health. An increase in the number of new cases of COVID-19 is likely to lead to an increase in the number of cases of mood and anxiety disorders but this will be short lived. By contrast, the absence of risk horizons within the first 2 years of a COVID-19 diagnosis (ie, ongoing risk trajectories) for some diagnoses (eg, psychotic disorders, epilepsy or seizures, cognitive deficit, and dementia) indicate that patients and clinicians must remain vigilant about the possibility of these delayed sequelae. These findings also suggest that service provision needs to be reinforced and sustained, because new cases are likely to occur for a considerable time after the pandemic has subsided. The time to equal incidence informs us about what happens after the risk horizon has been reached. On the one hand, the risks might become approximately equal in the two cohorts so that a so-called COVID excess remains throughout follow-up and the time to equal incidence is never reached (ie, persistent risk trajectories), which was the case for insomnia and myoneural junction or muscle disease. On the other hand, the risks might reverse, with more new diagnoses in the other respiratory infection cohort than in the COVID-19 cohort after the risk horizon, so that a time to equal incidence is eventually reached (ie, transient risk trajectories), as seen for anxiety and mood disorders.

    Another important aspect of outcome trajectories is the proportion of people who received a neurological or psychiatric diagnosis who subsequently died. All-cause mortality was substantial among older adults diagnosed with neurological or psychiatric sequelae both after COVID-19 diagnosis and after another respiratory infection—notably, those with epilepsy or seizures, dementia, cognitive deficit, and psychotic disorder. The fact that similar proportions of patients with these outcomes died in both cohorts suggests that this high mortality reflects general physical ill health rather than being related to SARS-CoV-2 infection itself.

    The mortality rate in older patients also raises the issue of death as a competing risk.

    22

    • Manja V
    • AlBashir S
    • Guyatt G
    Criteria for use of composite end points for competing risks-a systematic survey of the literature with recommendations.

    Because both death and the individual outcomes tend to be more common after COVID-19, the survivorship bias introduced when analysing individual outcomes brings HRs closer to 1. Individual outcomes, rather than composite outcomes with death, better reflect the burden of post-COVID-19 sequelae on health systems whereas composite outcomes are probably more informative to patients. Some outcomes have an HR of less than 1 when analysed in isolation and an HR of more than 1 when investigated as part of a composite outcome with death. Outcomes in this category are less likely to occur after COVID-19 versus after any other respiratory infection, but this might at least partly be because patients died before they could be diagnosed with these outcomes. The role of death as a competing risk likely differs between age groups because death rates vary substantially, which might contribute to apparent differences in risk profiles.

    Compared with adults and older adults, children were at a particularly increased risk of epilepsy or seizures, encephalitis, and nerve, nerve root, and plexus disorder, leading to significantly higher cumulative incidence after 2 years (albeit with small absolute risks) in this age group. The persistence and severity of these outcomes cannot be determined from our study, but some will probably have deleterious consequences for children’s health and physical and educational development. Therefore, these findings inform the risks and benefits of vaccination (and other preventive measures) against COVID-19 in paediatric populations. Reassuringly, unlike adults, children were not at an increased risk of mood and anxiety disorders after SARS-CoV-2 infection (even in the first 6 months) and cognitive deficit in children had a transient risk trajectory rather than ongoing risks as seen in older groups. The difference in profiles and trajectories of risks in children might indicate that the pathogenesis of COVID-19 sequelae is different in some respects from that of adults.

    The risk of neurological and psychiatric diagnoses of COVID-19 was greater with the emergence of the delta variant (eg, for cognitive deficit, epilepsy or seizures, and ischaemic strokes) than just before its emergence. These risks were compounded by an increased risk of death (consistent with existing literature

    23

    • Twohig KA
    • Nyberg T
    • Zaidi A
    • et al.
    Hospital admission and emergency care attendance risk for SARS-CoV-2 delta (B.1.617.2) compared with alpha (B.1.1.7) variants of concern: a cohort study.

    )—for example, the HR for the composite of death or cognitive deficit was 1·38 (95% CI 1·27–1·48) whereas the HR for a diagnosis of cognitive deficit alone was 1·13 (1·02–1·26). Compared with just before the emergence of omicron, the neurological and psychiatric profile just after the emergence of omicron was broadly similar. For instance, we found no difference in the risk of cognitive deficit, epilepsy or seizures, ischaemic stroke, and psychotic disorder, and higher risks of some outcomes (eg mood disorder). All risks were largely offset by a reduced risk of death after the emergence of omicron (consistent with existing literature

    13

    • Nyberg T
    • Ferguson NM
    • Nash SG
    • et al.
    Comparative analysis of the risks of hospitalisation and death associated with SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529) and delta (B.1.617.2) variants in England: a cohort study.

    ). The decreased composite risks of death and neurological or psychiatric sequelae are reassuring for patients. However, the ongoing risk of individual outcomes indicates that health services will likely continue to face a similar rate of these post-COVID-19 diagnoses even with SARS-CoV-2 variants that lead to otherwise less severe disease.

    The possible mechanisms underlying neurological and psychiatric consequences of COVID-19 remain to be determined in longitudinal and multifaceted studies.

    24

    • Evans RA
    • McAuley H
    • Harrison EM
    • et al.
    Physical, cognitive, and mental health impacts of COVID-19 after hospitalisation (PHOSP-COVID): a UK multicentre, prospective cohort study.

    , 

    25

    Central nervous system outcomes of COVID-19.

    , 

    26

    Bridging knowledge gaps in the diagnosis and management of neuropsychiatric sequelae of COVID-19.

    Sequelae in children might in part be driven by a post-infectious immune-mediated mechanism such as acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), as has been suggested in a prospective study of 52 children hospitalised with COVID-19.

    9

    • Ray STJ
    • Abdel-Mannan O
    • Sa M
    • et al.
    Neurological manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infection in hospitalised children and adolescents in the UK: a prospective national cohort study.

    This is consistent with our observations of an increased risk of encephalitis in children only, and a higher rate of post-COVID epilepsy or seizures in children. In the whole cohort, the finding of a persisting increased risk of cognitive deficit and dementia, psychotic disorder, and epilepsy or seizures 2 years after SARS-CoV-2 infection suggests that any underlying mechanism must have ongoing activity well past the acute infection (e.g. endotheliopathy might lead to a damaged or fragile cerebral vasculature at risk of thrombotic events or recurrent leakage

    27

    Acute and chronic neurological disorders in COVID-19: potential mechanisms of disease.

    ). Notably, mood and anxiety disorders followed a different pattern than most other outcomes: their elevated risk subsided within 2 months, their cumulative incidence after 2 years was not increased, and children were not at greater risk at any stage after COVID-19 than after other respiratory infections. One possible explanation is that COVID-19 precipitates mood and anxiety disorders in individuals with an underlying predisposition, via a short-lived stress-related pathogenesis to which children are less susceptible.

    Our study has specific limitations in addition to those inherent in electronic health records studies. First, our COVID-19 cohorts are probably enriched for symptomatic cases because self-diagnosed or asymptomatic COVID-19 is less likely to be coded in the health record. This is also true of the comparator cohort and their respiratory infections, and so HRs are less affected by this limitation than are incidences. Second, COVID-19 appeared to be more severe than other respiratory infections, but the mediation of our results by severity of the illness was not analysed. However, mediation by several markers of severity has been tested in our previous study,

    4

    • Taquet M
    • Geddes JR
    • Husain M
    • Luciano S
    • Harrison PJ
    6-month neurological and psychiatric outcomes in 236 379 survivors of COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records.

    in which we showed that severity explains part, but not all, of the association between COVID-19 and specific neurological and psychiatric outcomes. Third, only individuals who were diagnosed early in the pandemic contributed data for the whole 2-year follow-up. This is a subgroup within the whole cohort that might not be representative of the whole cohort. Future studies should clarify risks at the 2-year time point once larger sample sizes with longer follow-up become available. Fourth, our allocation of cohorts to study variants is based on epidemiological incidence data of different variants, not individual genotyping. Hence, these cohorts are likely to contain a few cases of other variants, which we factored into the statistical power calculation. The presence of patients with different variants in each variant cohort will bring HRs closer to 1 and so differences between variants would likely be more substantial if individual genotyping were possible. Fifth, vaccination status (used in matching) is probably under-reported in TriNetX, because the prevalence of vaccination was low in both cohorts. This under-reporting might affect HRs calculated when comparing COVID-19 cohorts before and after the emergence of new variants. Selecting time windows that were close to each other mitigates this effect, but does not eliminate it. Previous vaccination is associated with reduced or unchanged risks of most neurological or psychiatric outcomes.

    28

    • Taquet M
    • Dercon Q
    • Harrison PJ
    Six-month sequelae of post-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 infection: a retrospective cohort study of 10,024 breakthrough infections.

    Therefore, the higher number of vaccinated people after (vs before) the emergence of each variant might have decreased the observed HRs. Sixth, children and adolescents were grouped together, so further studies are needed to characterise the risks in different paediatric subgroups. Seventh, although in-hospital mortality data are well captured in TriNetX, out-of-hospital mortality reporting is more variable and linkage with mortality indices is only partial, so our incidence estimates will be underestimates and should be interpreted cautiously; but HRs for composite outcomes should not be affected to the same extent. Eighth, we do not know the severity or course of each disorder after diagnosis, or whether or not these are similar after COVID-19 and after other respiratory infections.

    In summary, post-COVID neurological and psychiatric outcomes followed different risk trajectories: the risk of cognitive deficit, dementia, psychotic disorder, and epilepsy or seizures remained increased at 2 years after a COVID-19 diagnosis, while the risks of other diagnoses (notably, mood and anxiety disorders) subsided early and showed no overall excess over the 2-year follow-up. Children are not at increased risk of mood or anxiety disorders (even over the first 6 months) but share adults’ risk of several other diagnoses. The comparable risks seen after the emergence of omicron indicate that the neurological and psychiatric burden of COVID-19 might continue even with variants that lead to otherwise less severe disease. These findings are relevant for policy makers involved in anticipating and addressing the health burden of the pandemic, for researchers seeking to identify the mechanisms underpinning brain sequelae of COVID-19, and for patients and clinicians wishing to know the neurological and psychiatric risks following SARS-CoV-2 infections.

    MT and PJH designed the study and defined cohort inclusion and exclusion criteria, outcome criteria, and analytical approaches. MT, QD, RS, LZ, JM, and IC contributed to data processing. MT did the data analyses. MT and PJH interpreted the data. MT wrote the report with input from PJH, RS, LZ, and JM. MT and PJH accessed and verified the underlying study data. MT is the guarantor. All authors had full access to all the data in the study, and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleMarathon swimmer completes 100km journey for brain research
    Next Article Metabolic Minds Awards Program Recognizes Champions in Emerging Fields of Metabolic Psychiatry
    brainwealthy_vws1ex
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Gardasil Injection Lawsuit Claims HPV Vaccine Caused Neurological and Autonomic Dysfunction

    February 2, 2023

    REGENXBIO’s Duchenne Therapy RGX-202 Clinical Trial Begins Patient Recruitment

    February 2, 2023

    Aducanumab for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease

    February 2, 2023
    Add A Comment

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest sports news from SportsSite about soccer, football and tennis.

    This website provides information about Brain and other things. Keep Supporting Us With the Latest News and we Will Provide the Best Of Our To Makes You Updated All Around The World News. Keep Sporting US.

    Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest YouTube
    Top Insights

    Top UK Stocks to Watch: Capita Shares Rise as it Unveils

    January 15, 2021
    8.5

    Digital Euro Might Suck Away 8% of Banks’ Deposits

    January 12, 2021

    Oil Gains on OPEC Outlook That U.S. Growth Will Slow

    January 11, 2021
    Get Informed

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    © 2023 brainwealthy. Designed by brainwealthy.
    • Home
    • Contact us
    • DMCA
    • Privacy Policy

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.