Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:593–602.
Google Scholar
Whiteford HA, Degenhardt L, Rehm J, Baxter AJ, Ferrari AJ, Erskine HE, et al. Global burden of disease attributable to mental and substance use disorders: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2013;382:1575–86.
Google Scholar
Polanczyk GV, Willcutt EG, Salum GA, Kieling C, Rohde LA. ADHD prevalence estimates across three decades: An updated systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43:434–42.
Google Scholar
Russell G. The rise and rise of the autism diagnosis. Autism Open Access. 2012;2:1.
Google Scholar
Goodson J, Helstrom A, Halpern JM, Ferenschak MP, Gillihan SJ, Powers MB. Treatment of postraumatic stress disorder in U.S. Combat veterans: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Rep. 2011;109:573–99.
Google Scholar
Abbott A. Novartis to shut brain research facility. Nature. 2011;480:161–2.
Google Scholar
Insel TR, Scolnick EM. Cure therapeutics and strategic prevention: raising the bar for mental health research. Mol Psychiatry. 2006;11:11–17.
Google Scholar
Bolton TAW, Morgenroth E, Preti MG, van de Ville D. Tapping into multi-faceted human behavior and psychopathology using fMRI brain dynamics. Trends Neurosci. 2020;43:667–80.
Google Scholar
Kim H, Kim M, Im S-K, Fang S. Mouse Cre-LoxP system: general principles to determine tissue-specific roles of target genes. Lab Anim Res. 2018;34:147.
Google Scholar
Hyman SE. Psychiatric drug development: diagnosing a crisis. Cerebrum. 2013;2013:5.
Bespalov A, Steckler T, Altevogt B, Koustova E, Skolnick P, Deaver D, et al. Failed trials for central nervous system disorders do not necessarily invalidate preclinical models and drug targets. Nat Rev Drug Disco. 2016;15:516.
Google Scholar
Nestler EJ, Hyman SE. Animal models of neuropsychiatric disorders. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13:1161–9.
Google Scholar
Bolker JA. Animal models in translational research: rosetta stone or stumbling block? BioEssays. 2017;39:1–8.
Google Scholar
Howe JR, Bear MF, Golshani P, Klann E, Lipton SA, Mucke L, et al. The mouse as a model for neuropsychiatric drug development. Curr Biol. 2018;28:R909–R914.
Google Scholar
McArthur RA. Aligning physiology with psychology: translational neuroscience in neuropsychiatric drug discovery. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017;76:4–21.
Google Scholar
Zilkha N, Sofer Y, Beny Y, Kimchi T. From classic ethology to modern neuroethology: overcoming the three biases in social behavior research. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2016;38:96–108.
Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. 5th edn. 2013. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Publishing.
Wong AHC, Josselyn SA. Caution when diagnosing your mouse with schizophrenia: The use and misuse of model animals for understanding psychiatric disorders. Biol Psychiatry. 2016;79:32–38.
Google Scholar
Garner JP. The significance of meaning: Why do over 90% of behavioral neuroscience results fail to translate to humans, and what can we do to fix it? ILAR J. 2014;55:438–56.
Google Scholar
Anderson DJ, Adolphs R. A framework for studying emotions across species. Cell. 2014;157:187–200.
Google Scholar
Zych AD, Gogolla N. Expressions of emotions across species. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2021;68:57–66.
Google Scholar
Grinevich V, Neumann ID. Brain oxytocin: how puzzle stones from animal studies translate into psychiatry. Mol Psychiatry. 2021;26:265–79.
Google Scholar
LeDoux J. Rethinking the emotional brain. Neuron. 2012;73:653–76.
Google Scholar
Mobbs D, Adolphs R, Fanselow MS, Barrett LF, LeDoux JE, Ressler K, et al. Viewpoints: approaches to defining and investigating fear. Nat Neurosci. 2019;22:1205–16.
Google Scholar
Portman DS. Social and sexual behaviors in C. elegans: the first fifty years. J Neurogenet. 2020;34:389–94.
Google Scholar
Iliadi KG. The genetic basis of emotional behavior: has the time come for a Drosophila model? J Neurogenet. 2009;23:136–46.
Google Scholar
Silverman JL, Ellegood J. Behavioral and neuroanatomical approaches in models of neurodevelopmental disorders: opportunities for translation. Curr Opin Neurol. 2018;31:126–33.
Google Scholar
Insel T, Cuthbert B, Garvey M, Heinssen R, Pine D, Quinn K, et al. Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2010;167:748–51.
Sanislow CA, Ferrante M, Pacheco J, Rudorfer MV, Morris SE. Advancing translational research using NIMH research domain criteria and computational methods. Neuron. 2019;101:779–82.
Google Scholar
Anderzhanova E, Kirmeier T, Wotjak CT. Animal models in psychiatric research: The RDoC system as a new framework for endophenotype-oriented translational neuroscience. Neurobiol Stress. 2017;7:47–56.
Google Scholar
Richter-Levin G, Stork O, Schmidt MV. Animal models of PTSD: a challenge to be met. Mol Psychiatry. 2019;24:1135–56.
Google Scholar
Crawley JN. Behavioral phenotyping of rodents. Comp Med. 2003;53:140–6.
Google Scholar
Kondrakiewicz K, Kostecki M, Szadzińska W, Knapska E. Ecological validity of social interaction tests in rats and mice. Genes Brain Behav. 2019;18:1–14.
Google Scholar
Mandillo S, Tucci V, Hölter SM, Meziane H, al Banchaabouchi M, Kallnik M, et al. Reliability, robustness, and reproducibility in mouse behavioral phenotyping: a cross-laboratory study. Physiol Genomics. 2008;34:243–55.
Google Scholar
Silverman JL, Yang M, Lord C, Crawley JN. Behavioural phenotyping assays for mouse models of autism. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010;11:490–502.
Google Scholar
Krakauer JW, Ghazanfar AA, Gomez-Marin A, MacIver MA, Poeppel D. Neuroscience needs behavior: correcting a reductionist bias. Neuron. 2017;93:480–90.
Google Scholar
Commons KG, Cholanians AB, Babb JA, Ehlinger DG. The rodent forced swim test measures stress-coping strategy, not depression-like behavior. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2017;8:955–60.
Google Scholar
Crabbe JC, Wahlsten D, Dudek BC. Genetics of mouse behavior: interactions with laboratory environment. Science. 1999;284:1670–2.
Google Scholar
Helene Richter S. Systematic heterogenization for better reproducibility in animal experimentation. Lab Anim. 2017;46:343–9.
Google Scholar
Larrieu T, Cherix A, Duque A, Rodrigues J, Lei H, Gruetter R, et al. Hierarchical status predicts behavioral vulnerability and nucleus accumbens metabolic profile following chronic social defeat stress. Curr Biol. 2017;27:2202–2210. e4
Google Scholar
Varholick JA, Bailoo JD, Jenkins A, Voelkl B, Würbel H. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between social dominance status and common behavioral phenotypes in male laboratory mice. Front Behav Neurosci. 2021;14:1–13.
Google Scholar
Sorge RE, Martin LJ, Isbester KA, Sotocinal SG, Rosen S, Tuttle AH, et al. Olfactory exposure to males, including men, causes stress and related analgesia in rodents. Nat Methods. 2014;11:629–32.
Google Scholar
Georgiou P, Zanos P, Mou TM, An X, Gerhard DM, Dryanovski DI, et al. Experimenters’ sex modulates mouse behaviors and neural responses to ketamine via corticotropin releasing factor. Nat Neurosci. 2022;25:1191–1200. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-022-01146-x.
Google Scholar
Richter SH, Garner JP, Würbel H. Environmental standardization: cure or cause of poor reproducibility in animal experiments? Nat Methods. 2009;6:257–61.
Google Scholar
Insel TR. From animal models to model animals. Biol Psychiatry. 2007;62:1337–9.
Google Scholar
Kim JJ, Jung MW. Fear paradigms: the times they are a-changin’. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2018;24:38–43.
Google Scholar
Ressler RL, Maren S. Synaptic encoding of fear memories in the amygdala. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2019;54:54–59.
Google Scholar
Tovote P, Fadok JP, Lüthi A. Neuronal circuits for fear and anxiety. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015;16:317–31.
Google Scholar
LeDoux J. Fear and the brain: where have we been, and where are we going? Biol Psychiatry. 1998;44:1229–38.
Google Scholar
LeDoux JE. Thoughtful feelings. Curr Biol. 2020;30:R619–R623.
Google Scholar
Calhoon GG, Tye KM. Resolving the neural circuits of anxiety. Nat Neurosci. 2015;18:1394–404.
Google Scholar
Grupe DW, Nitschke JB. Uncertainty and anticipation in anxiety: an integrated neurobiological and psychological perspective. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013;14:488–501.
Google Scholar
Creel S, Schuette P, Christianson D. Effects of predation risk on group size, vigilance, and foraging behavior in an African ungulate community. Behav Ecol. 2014;25:773–84.
Google Scholar
Gomes N, Semin GR. Mapping human vigilance: the influence of conspecifics. Evolution Hum Behav. 2020;41:69–75.
Google Scholar
Trivedi MH, Rush AJ, Wisniewski SR, Nierenberg AA, Warden D, Ritz L, et al. Evaluation of outcomes with citalopram for depression using measurement-based care in STAR*D: Implications for clinical practice. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:28–40.
Google Scholar
Amitai M, Taler M, Lebow M, Ben-Baruch R, Apter A, Fennig S, et al. An increase in IL-6 levels at 6-month follow-up visit is associated with SSRI-emergent suicidality in high-risk children and adolescents treated with fluoxetine. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020;40:61–69.
Google Scholar
Becker M, Pinhasov A, Ornoy A. Animal models of depression: what can they teach us about the human disease? Diagnostics 2021;11:123.
Google Scholar
Deussing JM. Animal models of depression. Drug Disco Today Dis Models. 2006;3:375–83.
Google Scholar
Perusini JN, Fanselow MS. Neurobehavioral perspectives on the distinction between fear and anxiety. Learn Mem. 2015;22:417–25.
Google Scholar
Bishop SJ. Neurocognitive mechanisms of anxiety: an integrative account. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007;11:307–16.
Google Scholar
Pellman BA, Kim JJ. What can ethobehavioral studies tell us about the brain’s fear system? Trends Neurosci. 2016;39:420–31.
Google Scholar
Komori T, Makinodan M, Kishimoto T. Social status and modern-type depression: a review. Brain Behav. 2019;9:1–9.
Google Scholar
Viglione A, Chiarotti F, Poggini S, Giuliani A, Branchi I. Predicting antidepressant treatment outcome based on socioeconomic status and citalopram dose. Pharmacogenomics J. 2019;19:538–46.
Google Scholar
Sloman L, Gilbert P, Hasey G. Evolved mechanisms in depression: the role and interaction of attachment and social rank in depression. J Affect Disord. 2003;74:107–21.
Google Scholar
Voikar V, Gaburro S. Three pillars of automated home-cage phenotyping of mice: novel findings, refinement, and reproducibility based on literature and experience. Front Behav Neurosci. 2020;14:1–15.
Google Scholar
Richter SH. Automated home-cage testing as a tool to improve reproducibility of behavioral research? Front Neurosci. 2020;14:10–14.
Google Scholar
Robbers Y, Tersteeg MMH, Meijer JH, Coomans CP. Group housing and social dominance hierarchy affect circadian activity patterns in mice. R Soc Open Sci. 2021;8201985201985.
Zelikowsky M, Hui M, Karigo T, Choe A, Yang B, Blanco MR, et al. The neuropeptide Tac2 controls a distributed brain state induced by chronic social isolation stress. Cell. 2018;173:1265–1279. e19
Google Scholar
Kuperman Y, Issler O, Regev L, Musseri I, Navon I, Neufeld-Cohen A, et al. Perifornical urocortin-3 mediates the link between stress-induced anxiety and energy homeostasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:8393–8.
Google Scholar
Krackow S, Vannoni E, Codita A, Mohammed AH, Cirulli F, Branchi I, et al. Consistent behavioral phenotype differences between inbred mouse strains in the IntelliCage. Genes Brain Behav. 2010;9:722–31.
Google Scholar
Lipp H-P, Litvin O, Galsworthy M, Vyssotski DL, Vyssotski a L, Zinn P, et al. Automated behavioral analysis of mice using INTELLICAGE: inter-laboratory comparisons and validation with exploratory behavior and spatial learning. Proc Measuring Behav. 2005;2005:66–69.
Arakawa H, Blanchard DC, Blanchard RJ. Colony formation of C57BL/6J mice in visible burrow system: Identification of eusocial behaviors in a background strain for genetic animal models of autism. Behavioural Brain Res. 2007;176:27–39.
Google Scholar
Bove M, Ike K, Eldering A, Buwalda B, de Boer SF, Morgese MG, et al. The Visible Burrow System: A behavioral paradigm to assess sociability and social withdrawal in BTBR and C57BL/6J mice strains. Behavioural Brain Res. 2018;344:9–19.
Google Scholar
Blanchard DC, Spencer RL, Weiss SM, Blanchard RJ, McEwen B, Sakai RR. Visible burrow system as a model of chronic social stress: Behavioral and neuroendocrine correlates. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1995;20:117–34.
Google Scholar
Melhorn SJ, Elfers CT, Scott KA, Sakai RR. A closer look at the subordinate population within the visible burrow system. Physiol Behav. 2017;178:110–6.
Google Scholar
McEwen BS, McKittrick CR, Tamashiro KLK, Sakai RR. The brain on stress: Insight from studies using the Visible Burrow System. Physiol Behav. 2015;146:47–56.
Google Scholar
Tamashiro KLK, Nguyen MMN, Fujikawa T, Xu T, Ma LY, Woods SC, et al. Metabolic and endocrine consequences of social stress in a visible burrow system. Physiol Behav. 2004;80:683–93.
Google Scholar
Moles A, Bartolomucci A, Garbugino L, Conti R, Caprioli A, Coccurello R, et al. Psychosocial stress affects energy balance in mice: Modulation by social status. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2006;31:623–33.
Google Scholar
Williamson CM, Franks B, Curley JP. Mouse social network dynamics and community structure are associated with plasticity-related brain gene expression. Front Behav Neurosci. 2016;10:1–16.
Google Scholar
Williamson CM, Lee W, Curley JP. Temporal dynamics of social hierarchy formation and maintenance in male mice. Anim Behav. 2016;115:259–72.
Google Scholar
Lee W, Fu J, Bouwman N, Farago P, Curley JP. Temporal microstructure of dyadic social behavior during relationship formation in mice. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0220596.
Google Scholar
Curley JP. Temporal pairwise-correlation analysis provides empirical support for attention hierarchies in mice. Biol Lett. 2016;12:20160192.
Google Scholar
Anderson DJ, Perona P. Toward a science of computational ethology. Neuron. 2014;84:18–31.
Google Scholar
de Chaumont F, Coura RDS, Serreau P, Cressant A, Chabout J, Granon S, et al. Computerized video analysis of social interactions in mice. Nat Methods. 2012;9:410–7.
Google Scholar
Kabra M, Robie AA, Rivera-Alba M, Branson S, Branson K. JAABA: interactive machine learning for automatic annotation of animal behavior. Nat Methods. 2013;10:64–67.
Google Scholar
Datta SR, Anderson DJ, Branson K, Perona P, Leifer A. Computational neuroethology: a call to action. Neuron. 2019;104:11–24.
Google Scholar
Hong W, Kennedy A, Burgos-Artizzu XP, Zelikowsky M, Navonne SG, Perona P, et al. Automated measurement of mouse social behaviors using depth sensing, video tracking, and machine learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:E5351–E5360.
Google Scholar
Segalin C, Williams J, Karigo T, Hui M, Zelikowsky M, Sun JJ, et al. The Mouse Action Recognition System (MARS) software pipeline for automated analysis of social behaviors in mice. 2021;10:e63720.
Chen Z, Zhang R, Zhang YE, Zhou H, Fang HS, Rock RR, et al. AlphaTracker: a multi-animal tracking and behavioral analysis tool. BioRxiv. 2020:1–20, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.12.04.405159v1.
Mathis A, Mamidanna P, Cury KM, Abe T, Murthy VN, Mathis MW, et al. DeepLabCut: markerless pose estimation of user-defined body parts with deep learning. Nat Neurosci. 2018;21:1281–9.
Google Scholar
Pereira TD, Tabris N, Matsliah A, et al. SLEAP: A deep learning system for multi-animal pose tracking. Nat Methods. 2022;19:486–495.
Google Scholar
Walter T, Couzin ID. Trex, a fast multi-animal tracking system with markerless identi cation, and 2d estimation of posture and visual elds. Elife. 2021;10:1–73.
Google Scholar
Nilsson SRO, Goodwin NL, Choong JJ, Hwang S, Wright HR, Norville ZC, et al. Simple Behavioral Analysis (SimBA) – an open source toolkit for computer classification of complex social behaviors in experimental animals. BioRxiv. 2020;02:1–29.
Datta SR. Q&A: Understanding the composition of behavior. BMC Biol. 2019;17:1–7.
Google Scholar
Wiltschko AB, Johnson MJ, Iurilli G, Peterson RE, Katon JM, Pashkovski SL, et al. Mapping sub-second structure in mouse behavior. Neuron 2015;88:1121–35.
Google Scholar
Markowitz JE, Gillis WF, Beron CC, Neufeld SQ, Robertson K, Bhagat ND, et al. The striatum organizes 3D behavior via moment-to-moment action selection. Cell. 2018;174:44–58. e17
Google Scholar
Gomez-Marin A, Paton JJ, Kampff AR, Costa RM, Mainen ZF. Big behavioral data: psychology, ethology and the foundations of neuroscience. Nat Neurosci. 2014;17:1455–62.
Google Scholar
Puścian A, Łęski S, Kasprowicz G, Winiarski M, Borowska J, Nikolaev T, et al. Eco-HAB as a fully automated and ecologically relevant assessment of social impairments in mouse models of autism. Elife. 2016;5:1–22.
Google Scholar
Zocher S, Schilling S, Grzyb AN, Adusumilli VS, Lopes JB, Günther S, et al. Early-life environmental enrichment generates persistent individualized behavior in mice. Sci Adv. 2020;6:eabb1478.
Shemesh Y, Sztainberg Y, Forkosh O, Shlapobersky T, Chen A, Schneidman E. High-order social interactions in groups of mice. Elife. 2013;2013:1–19.
Henson C, Truchot D, Canevello A. What promotes post traumatic growth? A systematic review. Eur J Trauma Dissociation. 2021;5:100195.
Forkosh O, Karamihalev S, Roeh S, Alon U, Anpilov S, Touma C, et al. Identity domains capture individual differences from across the behavioral repertoire. Nat Neurosci. 2019;22:2023–8.
Google Scholar
Shemesh Y, Forkosh O, Mahn M, Anpilov S, Sztainberg Y, Manashirov S, et al. Ucn3 and CRF-R2 in the medial amygdala regulate complex social dynamics. Nat Neurosci. 2016;19:1489–96.
Google Scholar
Anpilov S, Shemesh Y, Eren N, Harony-Nicolas H, Benjamin A, Dine J, et al. Wireless optogenetic stimulation of oxytocin neurons in a semi-natural setup dynamically elevates both pro-social and agonistic behaviors. Neuron. 2020;107:644–655. e7
Google Scholar
Karamihalev S, Flachskamm C, Eren N, Kimura M, Chen A. Social context and dominance status contribute to sleep patterns and quality in groups of freely-moving mice. Sci Rep. 2019;9:1–8.
Google Scholar
Karamihalev S, Brivio E, Flachskamm C, Stoffel R, Schmidt MV, Chen A. Social dominance mediates behavioral adaptation to chronic stress in a sex-specific manner. Elife. 2020;9:1–18.
Google Scholar
Lopez JP, Lücken MD, Brivio E, Karamihalev S, Kos A, de Donno C, et al. Ketamine exerts its sustained antidepressant effects via cell-type-specific regulation of Kcnq2. Neuron. 2022;110:2283–2298. e9
Google Scholar
Ohayon S, Avni O, Taylor AL, Perona P, Roian Egnor SE. Automated multi-day tracking of marked mice for the analysis of social behaviour. J Neurosci Methods. 2013;219:10–19.
Google Scholar
Weissbrod A, Shapiro A, Vasserman G, Edry L, Dayan M, Yitzhaky A, et al. Automated long-term tracking and social behavioural phenotyping of animal colonies within a semi-natural environment. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2018.
de Chaumont F, Ey E, Torquet N, Lagache T, Dallongeville S, Imbert A, et al. Real-time analysis of the behaviour of groups of mice via a depth-sensing camera and machine learning. Nat Biomed Eng. 2019;3:930–42.
Google Scholar
Nourizonoz A, Zimmermann R, Ho CLA, Pellat S, Ormen Y, Prévost-Solié C, et al. EthoLoop: automated closed-loop neuroethology in naturalistic environments. Nat Methods. 2020;17:1052–9.
Google Scholar
Thayer JF, Åhs F, Fredrikson M, Sollers JJ, Wager TD. A meta-analysis of heart rate variability and neuroimaging studies: Implications for heart rate variability as a marker of stress and health. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012;36:747–56.
Google Scholar
