‘Words matter’: the campaign to change the language of maternity care

Imagine the scene: after 9 months of pregnancy, youve remained in labour for days. Youre more tired than ever in the past, concerned about your as-yet-unborn kid and attempting to summon the energy for the next contraction, when you hear the midwife or physician mutter something about “poor maternal effort”.

Medical terminology ought to empower ladies, instead of shaming them.

” This concept of the woman as vessel, a non reusable container for the baby, has older, deep roots. We also have infantilising language such as women being called great lady. This paternalistic approach implies that women need to do what they are informed in the birth room, as if they are children, and enables for a truly stunning lack of understanding by some healthcare professionals about the concepts of authorization.”.

In the glossary, geriatric pregnancy ends up being 35+ pregnancy; unwelcoming womb ends up being uterine lining obstacles; and failure to progress– an out-of-date term that refers to a slowed labour– becomes, well, slowed labour.

The total Renaming Revolution glossary is offered free of charge online, with printed copies being circulated to centers, classes and other centres in the UK and the US.

We also have infantilising language such as ladies being called great woman.

Dehumanising language adds to this, thinks Hill, “by recommending that it does not matter that so many women are harmed and traumatised by the current birth system, because females dont really matter. We see this embedded in language such as a healthy child is all that matters, or when women are referred to as mum.

” Too much of the language of maternity care is misogynistic, infantilising or dehumanising,” states Hill. “Misogynistic language is normally underpinned by the concept that ladiess bodies do not work especially well, for instance phrases like inept cervix. It likewise very cleverly puts the focus of blame on the female body, when we understand that usually, it is the system that stops working ladies, which in most cases they might have had an extremely different birth experience, had they been provided the support and environment their labouring bodies required.”.

Main image: Anna Hecker.

Some 63 out-of-date and painful expressions get a reboot in the Renaming Revolution glossary.

The response from those behind a project to enhance upon blaming or upsetting labels related to motherhood, is a resounding no. Its one of the 63 “painful and out-of-date” expressions to get a reboot in the Renaming Revolution glossary, published by the parenting app Peanut.

When medicine appeared to see womens bodies as things in need of fixing or curing, numerous of these terms were created by men at a time. Rooted in historical misogyny, its time our vocabulary supported females, states Milli Hill, author of the Positive Birth Book and of Give Birth Like a Feminist. Though Hill does not concur with all the modifications proposed by Peanut, she invites the discussion the project starts.

Numerous of these terms were developed by guys at a time when medication seemed to view femaless bodies as items in requirement of curing or repairing. Rooted in historic misogyny, its time our vocabulary supported ladies, says Milli Hill, author of the Positive Birth Book and of Give Birth Like a Feminist. “Misogynistic language is generally underpinned by the idea that womens bodies do not work particularly well, for example expressions like inexperienced cervix. It also very skillfully puts the focus of blame on the female body, when we know that many frequently, it is the system that fails women, and that in lots of cases they could have had a very various birth experience, had they been given the support and environment their labouring bodies required.”.

But this terms is outdated,” states Dr Somi Javaid, who encouraged on the project. “The objective with medical terminology need to be to educate women and to shift far from blame or upsetting labels, empowering ladies, instead of shaming them.”.

The project was influenced by a video that a female published on the app, in which she states hearing a medical professional utilize the word “geriatric” to describe her, when she was trying to develop at the age of 38. The post caused an outpouring of support from ladies and to them sharing their experience of other hurtful terms.

Michelle Kennedy, creator of the Peanut app, which is behind the renaming campaign. Credit: Peanut.

” Terms such as unwelcoming womb, geriatric pregnancy, spontaneous abortion, and advanced maternal age have generally been utilized to designate a ladys reproductive standing..

A glossary of more em powering phrases about motherhood is being offered to health professionals, to assist them frame discussions around pregnancy, fertility and loss

Motherhood does not included a handbook, but language that doesnt make women feel as if they have failed before their kid is even born, seems an empowering start.

The expression has actually been used at expectant moms bedsides for many years, to explain the tiredness of labour interfering with the descent of the baby through the birth canal. Should it be utilized at all?

” Words matter. Altering the damaging discourse thats become so normalised as a way to describe womens bodies is long overdue,” states Michelle Kennedy, founder and CEO of Peanut.

About the author